tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post1198878535862118673..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: Is This Science? A comparison... Dr. Willie Soon vs. Professor Inez Fungcitizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-27159414589166334222013-08-20T09:00:23.620-07:002013-08-20T09:00:23.620-07:00And what pray tell does Prof. Essex actually expla...<br />And what pray tell does Prof. Essex actually explain?<br /><br />He ignores big parts of the real story...<br /><br />he uses politically loaded jokes when he'd promised serious science discussion and explanations...<br /><br />he makes grand claims about his own insights and mastery, but his academic record is quite thin...<br /><br />makes a few outrageous - unsupported claims about others dishonesty...<br /><br />He dismisses the "hockey stick" out of hand - but ignores the basic well known and unavoidable physics of GHGs - <br /><br />... or that "hockey stick" shaped graphs have been produced in many dozens of studies examining various aspects of Earth's climate history.<br /><br />he implies that these GCMs are all scientists have that points at global warming - something that's as false as it gets.<br /><br />His YouTube talk you shared is another political performance bud, it ain't science. <br /><br />Want science? Listen to serious lectures... not politically soaked arm waving. After all a statistician can prove anything he want's to an uncritical audience. <br />{Science in a vacuum}<br /><br />That's the beauty of the greater climatological community, they are constantly working over each others idea, weeding out the weak, learning from lessons, and steadily improving.<br /><br />Allow me to recommend a few:<br />http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2013/08/index-for-my-climate-science-video.html<br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br /><br />But, the biggest lie Prof. Essex and folks like you broadcast is the notion that Climate Models need to be 99.9% accurate before we should pay attention to what they are telling us. <br /><br />We know what we need to know, the past decades have been giving us plenty of physical proof that we are continuing a very dangerous experiment at full throttle...<i> a fairly insane thing to do :- ( </i>citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-31273078487889215472013-08-19T20:35:21.273-07:002013-08-19T20:35:21.273-07:00Interesting title.
How does her talk tell us anyt...Interesting title.<br /><br />How does her talk tell us anything about the robustness of climate projections? <br /><br />Nonsense.<br /><br />This is real climate talk by Chris Essex. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvhipLNeda4<br />Hwanhttp://www.juans-lawns.com/Home_Page.htmlnoreply@blogger.com