tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post3985136607137020667..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: Mr. Anthony Watts, how can you ignore evidence like this?citizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-23923803723287736412014-10-18T05:48:04.328-07:002014-10-18T05:48:04.328-07:00Good point Reginald, for more background on Peter ...Good point Reginald, for more background on Peter Hadfield's various examinations into Monckton's outlandish claims see: <a href="http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2012/01/wuwt-champions-and-cheers-moncktons.htmll" rel="nofollow"> WUWT champions and cheers Monckton's lies, fortunately Peter Hadfield gives an excellent response</a>citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-41153132245214303792013-08-25T08:54:19.737-07:002013-08-25T08:54:19.737-07:00Willard A Watt's is projecting on an IMAX scal...Willard A Watt's is projecting on an IMAX scale when he calls others trolls.In the facts based version of reality, Anthony Watts is King of the climate trolls.<br />If you want to be banned from Watt's anti-science blog, all you have to do is make a comment that mentions Lord Monckton's running away from the Peter Hadfield's debate.<br />Watt's even lies to his reader about the debate by claiming that Hadfield and Monckton came to an amicable agreement about cancelling the debate. Nothing could be further from the truth.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07604184699513441116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-10064256068558429162013-08-25T00:28:57.437-07:002013-08-25T00:28:57.437-07:00Like you I'm amazed that any honest person can...Like you I'm amazed that any honest person can be ignoring the evidence that exists today. It's not absolutely settled, but it is incredibly strong. I don't really have a good sense of why this is happening. It does feel that one is simply that it goes against people's political views (government regulation) and I can't really believe that the fossil fuel industry is simply sitting back and not influencing the debate.<br /><br />It is possible that some are genuinely honest but just don't understand the evidence sufficiently well and really do think that the mismatch between GCMs and observations in the last decade is significant. If so, they're still stupid for not listening to the scientists telling them that they're wrong.Wotts Up With That Bloghttp://wottsupwiththatblog.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com