tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post5652327939602662405..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: Discussion with Pete Ridley #5 Barrett's MODTRANcitizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-36529316089273098642014-07-11T06:50:03.072-07:002014-07-11T06:50:03.072-07:00I sent off this email to our pal Mr. Ridley:
Mr. ...I sent off this email to our pal Mr. Ridley:<br /><br />Mr. Ridley,<br /><br />Now you are turning into a jerk. If you can't get on topic and keep away from your worthless obsessing over trivial grips that add to nothing except avoiding the real discussion and wasting my precious time, I see no reason to do you the courtesy of continuing to post your drivel.<br /><br />It is possible to have a rational discussion with someone you don't like, but it requires good faith in the discussion, unfortunately from our exchanges I see you don't possess any of that - it's all game playing with you. <br /><br />You seem to be one of those who loves the endless dog-chasing-tail sophomoric debate. Makes me think of folks stand around watching their boat sink arguing over how fast it's sinking, rather than trying to bail and patch.citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-83651253073250791292014-07-11T06:31:41.947-07:002014-07-11T06:31:41.947-07:00"Pete Ridley - comment at 1:32 AM" - REJ... "Pete Ridley - comment at 1:32 AM" - REJECTED!<br />I'm done with your game of inane obfuscation.<br /><br />You rude avoidance will no longer be tolerated over here! If you can't answer my questions directly and in good-faith - your comment will be rejected.citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.com