tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post8260825008093670330..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: The Lord Christopher Monckton Files - an indexcitizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-80825036523590524182013-09-06T04:07:18.894-07:002013-09-06T04:07:18.894-07:00The actual calculation is remarkable and just comp...The actual calculation is remarkable and just completely flawed. Yes, they can find a source for every number they've used but that does not mean that they've put these numbers together in a way that makes any form of sense (and it doesn't as you probably know).<br /><br />It's things like this that really get me down. I'm quite happy for people to be skeptical about climate science and to be uncertain (or disagree) with what should or should not be done. However when people promote something that is clearly garbage, it really does make me think that some are just trying to mislead and that there is no chance of any kind of honest debate. I don't even really care if after a debate no agreement has been reached. I do care if the argument being promoted by some is so nonsensical that it makes it virtually impossible to actually have a debate. At least accept what is clearly wrong and maybe we can actually get somewhere. <br /><br />Living in hope, but realising its futile!Wotts Up With That Bloghttp://wottsupwiththatblog.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com