tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post3177760733587277153..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: Response to Prof John Nielsen-Gammon - 2/17/2014citizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-30659306653588202462014-02-18T16:44:15.595-08:002014-02-18T16:44:15.595-08:00tad too "earthy" ;- }
Good criticism...<i>tad too "earthy" ;- } </i><br /><br />Good criticism though, fixed that.<br /><br />thankscitizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-39064301770575248852014-02-18T08:54:17.361-08:002014-02-18T08:54:17.361-08:00Thanks for posting. Minor constructive criticism:...Thanks for posting. Minor constructive criticism: I think stronger to just say "Backed by what?" rather than "Backed by what--a couple of pissed-off e-mails?" Frees you from accusation of putting words in someone else's mouth.climatehawk1noreply@blogger.com