tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post4971274086889395390..comments2024-03-01T18:58:48.605-08:00Comments on What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: Poptech’s list of Confusion - ItsNotNovacitizenschallengehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-37424363962593618082016-01-28T18:38:09.422-08:002016-01-28T18:38:09.422-08:00Poptech, here is a selection of the sources I have...Poptech, here is a selection of the sources I have linked to.<br />Please explain to me what your list has to do with disputing the information these people have to share.<br /><br />CO2 levels were greater in the deep distant past<br /><a href="http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2016/01/3-evolution-carbon-biosphere-hazen.html" rel="nofollow"> http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2016/01/3-evolution-carbon-biosphere-hazen.html </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />On adding ~3 billion metric tons of CO2<br /><a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2827&from=rss_home%23.VqUQiulyHwx" rel="nofollow"> http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2827&from=rss_home%23.VqUQiulyHwx </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <br />The IPCC: Who Are They and Why Do Their Climate Reports Matter?<br /><a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/ipcc-backgrounder.html#.VqUlAulyHww" rel="nofollow"> http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/science/ipcc-backgrounder.html#.VqUlAulyHww </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />Understanding the IPCC Reports<br /><a href="http://www.wri.org/ipcc-infographics" rel="nofollow"> http://www.wri.org/ipcc-infographics </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />FAQ: IPCC's Upcoming Climate Change Report Explained<br /><a href="http://www.livescience.com/39763-ipcc-report-faq.html" rel="nofollow"> http://www.livescience.com/39763-ipcc-report-faq.html </a><br />Global Analysis - Annual 2009 - <br /><a href="https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/200913" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/200913 </a><br />and <br /><a href="https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/why-did-earth's-surface-temperature-stop-rising-past-decade" rel="nofollow"> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/why-did-earth's-surface-temperature-stop-rising-past-decade </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis - Key Findings<br /><a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_IPCC_Jakarta2.pdf" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/ar5/wg1/WGIAR5_IPCC_Jakarta2.pdf </a><br />~ ~ ~<br /><a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter05_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter05_FINAL.pdf </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />IPCC's Chapter 5 - Information from Paleoclimate Archives<br /><a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter05_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_Chapter05_FINAL.pdf </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br />IPCC - Chapter 6.6 The Last 2,000 Years<br />6.6.1 Northern Hemisphere Temperature Variability <br />6.6.1.1 What Do Reconstructions Based on Palaeoclimatic Proxies Show?<br /><a href="https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6.html" rel="nofollow"> https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6.html </a><br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br /><a href="http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/index.phphttp://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed" rel="nofollow"> http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/index.phphttp://www.alecexposed.org/wiki/ALEC_Exposed </a><br />citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-22988232894225230442016-01-28T18:25:19.086-08:002016-01-28T18:25:19.086-08:00… and you Poptech, my pal, are sadly disconnected ...… and you Poptech, my pal, are sadly disconnected from reality.<br />What you want everyone to ignore is the substance of itsnotnova's review of your game.<br />And now you pile on two more comments, a list of 14points, no less, adding up to over 700 words.<br /><br />That's sort of funny, considering you are the fellow who wrote:<br /> January 26, 2016 at 1:22 AM Poptech writes: <br />*"Now you are making libelous claims that I attempt to "overwhelm with self-serving rhetoric"?"*<br /><br />The pathetic thing is most of your statements underscore the illegitimacy of your self-certain list and show how incapable you are of objectivity or any sense of self-skepticism, or humor for that matter. You have list you put together by your own rules to fight straw men you erect, it's a farce. What gives you the right to dismiss the information real professional agencies and scientists have amassed for us?<br /><br />By now you should know the drill with gish-gallops around here.<br />I'll save your 700+, 14 point masterpiece of self-rationalization, until I can review and comment on it.<br />Then it'll become a stand alone posts.<br />citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-20671540941721090182016-01-28T18:09:25.615-08:002016-01-28T18:09:25.615-08:00What's that got to do with price of tea in Chi...What's that got to do with price of tea in China?<br />Boy, oh boy the things you fixate on.citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-87324128565973342982016-01-28T15:36:55.483-08:002016-01-28T15:36:55.483-08:00So you too are a scientifically illiterate moron l...<b>So you too are a scientifically illiterate moron like "It's Not Nova" and do not understand that "Letters" is a term used to describe a type of peer-reviewed scientific document format in certain scholarly journals such as Nature and should not be confused with "Letters to the Editor"?</b>Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-30072428772918491122016-01-28T14:06:51.054-08:002016-01-28T14:06:51.054-08:00Oh and yup, you caught me.
This was a pure cut...Oh and yup, you caught me. <br />This was a pure cut'n paste.<br /><br />What can I say, <br />there was nothing for me to improve or second-guess. ;- )<br />citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-26248701918543154972016-01-28T14:04:07.065-08:002016-01-28T14:04:07.065-08:00Andrew, why am I not surprised.
You really could ...Andrew, why am I not surprised.<br /><br />You really could do with a fit of self-skepticism,<br />your rationalizations are a tad formulaic. <br /><br />If you're ever ready to look outside your bubble, come on down.<br /><br />Dodge and weave all you like, <br />you still got some questions to answer.citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692282252844489453.post-24181804851927327892016-01-28T13:37:41.680-08:002016-01-28T13:37:41.680-08:00You continue to censor my comments and not allow t...You continue to censor my comments and not allow them to appear in their original location unedited - apparently you are afraid of anyone reading them.<br /><br />With this post it is confirmed that you are dumber than I realized. That nonsense is only copied and pasted by utter morons and completely refuted here:<br /><br /><a href="http://z4.invisionfree.com/Popular_Technology/index.php?showtopic=4328" rel="nofollow">Rebuttal to "Poptech's list of Confusion" #2</a>Andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05170143101028077396noreply@blogger.com