{updated with comments June 18 evening.}
Here we have Lee Stamper, he's been commenting at YouTube on a video I featured over here on May 4th, he doesn't pretend to be interested in understanding climate science. He's just pissed off and likes verbally attacking "alarmists".
Since there's no substance to discuss, the only reason I'm devoting a blog post to him is because his verbal abuse has just crossed over the line into the threat territory. Thus, I'll document it over here.
Since there's no substance to discuss, the only reason I'm devoting a blog post to him is because his verbal abuse has just crossed over the line into the threat territory. Thus, I'll document it over here.
Lee Stamper you are welcome to comment over here, please explain why are you so over the top upset with me?
The Science Behind Global Warming (Documentary)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-sy6rPJBj4
Lee Stamper 3:30 PM | June 17, 2015 - Writes:
+citizenschallengeYT now since you think you know everything about me I can see you have never been in the military bozo..if you know everything about me tell me how many Viet Cong I have notches on my knife for ? better look over your sholder you may piss the wrong person off next time
___________________________________________________________
Lee didn't respond over here, but he did over at YouTube
so I'll just cut an paste that along with my response over here.
This is what a virtual debate looks like.
So tell me sityzchalgne , what does looking somebody up on facebook to dig "dirt" up on them have to do with debating whether global warming is real or not?
You are right maybe Emily will learn from this and see the dirty tactics that are used against "deniers"
All i'll say to this again is your attempt at justifying your personal attack on someone is wrong.
Is it wrong for the NSA to violate the 4th amendment in order to convict a supposed convict? absolutely. Even if you find something that proves wrongdoing you can not use that information because it was a violation of the 4th.
It works both ways pal, if you patronise arguments and facts from the other side (which you have done) you have to expect some of your own medicine fed back to you. Do not confuse my defiance to your pompous tone as running and hiding from "reality"
This is supposed to be about looking at Earth observations and learning about the two hundred years of scientific development that is behind the "Anthropogenic Global Warming" consensus.
But, seems like all you folks want to do is turn this into a MMA Cage Fight, toughest guy wins. That's bull shit buddy. All you're offering is vandalism - I'm into the constructive part of life for my wonder filled few years on this fantastical planet - but you knuckle heads don't even seem to know anything exists beyond your own heads. You are so stupid proud of your contempt for our civilization and biosphere. So f'n tragic. Why are so many of you people out there so hell bent on destruction??? It actually a beautiful world out there, but we are destroying fast as we can.
______________________________________
Lee proves my point, not the slightest interest in learning about our global climate system. Here we see Lee devolve into handwaving, another
lost soul flailing against the cold winds of reality. (June 19th)
There's nothing remotely serious enough to respond to or try to explain.
Just another example of a climate science unidirectional skeptic's meltdown.
Please just report the wanker and block him.
ReplyDeleteActually this isn't about that wanker.
ReplyDelete(Well, there is my policy of publicly confronting threats by posting them. I think more people should do that.)
More important, it's related to my informal study of "Seepage" and how the public dialogue has been deliberately poisoned.
It' about warning some younger inexperienced activists what's out there waiting for them.
Perhaps giving them a leg up with their responses to what they encounter.
It's about dissecting the pubic debate and exposing the various nasty games being played.
A learning experience for myself and others.
You're so right about calling it 'seepage'. This method of insinuating negativity into an argument, to the point where the discussion is no longer able to address the premise, occurs in many topics argued on the internet, not just CC/AGW. When it crops up in the field of international relationships it degrades diplomacy to the point where war can easily break out.
ReplyDeleteAlways brave, behind a computer screen, aren't they? oi.
ReplyDeleteSo "vrooomie" another veiled threat.
ReplyDeleteYou can threaten people, you can beat up people, you can even destroy people,
but that bull-shit has absolutely nothing to do with learning about what we are doing to our life supporting planet.
It could be a much better world if you folks would get your collective heads out of the trenches!