Showing posts with label Climate sensitivity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate sensitivity. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

What's Natural about Steele's Sea Level conundrum? Pacifica Tribune 3/20/2019

In his March 20th What’s Natural? column, Jim Steele winds up in a conundrum because he’s obsessing on Greenland while trying to figure out California’s sea level rise.  It got me to thinking about those six blind men grappling to make sense of an elephant while focusing on individual parts.  
Steele’s conundrum will never get resolved until he pulls back and starts taking in the whole of our Global Heat and Moisture Distribution Engine.
The biggest problem is that Steele’s confusion is deliberate.  See, Jim’s no teacher, he’s a performance artist who has become skilled at taking bits and pieces of true facts, ignoring great swaths of important information, then concocting just so stories to entertain and sooth, rather than inform and prepare.  
He gets away with it because his audience wants to be deceived - and because rationalists fear to confront such belligerent self-certain willful ignorance. 
Why do I care?  Because I love this planet and truth matters! 
Because someone needs to be a Witness for honesty and defender of We The People’s right to learn about this wonderful fantastical planet Earth that created us >>> without the constant cross screaming of malicious dedicated liars!
I’ve dissected March 20th’s Pacifica Tribune’s What’s Natural? because it offers me another opportunity to examine ‘libertarian’ fraud in action, while giving me an excuse to share a treasure trove of related links to solid educational resources for the curious.  
REPRINTED UNDER PROTECTION OF FAIR USE COPYRIGHT LAWS.  
My intention is a point by point review of 'libertarian' deception in action.
Click on image for better viewing and comparing.

Peter Hadfield made an easy to follow overview of the meme Jim’s parroting.

potholer54  |  Published on May 15, 2017
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Friday, March 6, 2015

This is what a scientist sounds like - Dr.Dessler's video shorts


Here are five short videos by Atmospheric scientist Dr. Andrew Dessler explaining various aspects of climate sensitivity including a look at Lindzen and Spencer's failed cloud feedback study.  I think these videos are fine examples of a real scientist in action explaining the facts.  Tell me you don't notice a huge difference between Dr. Dessler's approach to his topic and the weird handwaving and innuendo laced approach of folks like Dr. Singer or my man Steele.  
(I put together the notes so any mistakes in them are mine alone.)

Summary of Dessler GRL 2011
Is the climate sensitivity less than 2°C?
Stratospheric water vapor feedback
Climate sensitivity calculations, Kummer and Dessler, GRL, 2014
Decision making under uncertainty

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Uploaded on Sep 5, 2011 | dessler2 | 3:45 minutes

"Cloud variations and the Earth's energy budget"
published in Geophysical Review Letters


Dessler examines Lindzen and Spencer's suggestioin that it's clouds causing warming and that human influence warming.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Global Warming Policy Foundation misleading the public


This seems like a timely SkepticalScience.com article to Repost.  Not much to add, except that if you've been immersed in the climate science "skeptics" echo-chamber, here's your change to learn about The Rest of The Story regarding "climate sensitivity". . .

With thanks to the John Cook and the other volunteers at Skeptical Science.com here's an article by Dana Nuccitelli. 


GWPF optimism on climate sensitivity is ill-founded (via Skeptical Science)
Posted on 10 March 2014 by dana1981 The UK anti-climate policy advocacy group Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has published a report written by Nic Lewis and Marcel Crok claiming “the IPCC hid the good news” regarding climate sensitivity…

Friday, July 26, 2013

The problem with Mr. McIntyre and his enablers



Paul_K 
Posted Jul 26, 2013 at 11:59 AM | Reply
Citizenschallenge,"We know we are driving our climate to conditions no human, let alone a complex society has ever confronted…"
 
What do you think polar sea ice conditions looked like during the Holocene optimum? 

Carrick
Posted Jul 26, 2013 at 12:12 PM 
I’d settle with reliable numbers on arctic sea ice for the 1950s.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
citizenschallenge
Posted Jul 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM | Reply 

- Your comment is awaiting moderation.-

Paul, what does that sort of question do to help understand the situation we are facing? Sounded like a mesmerist’s misdirection to me.
~ ~ ~

We have increased our planet’s atmospheric insulating ability by over a third – the global heat distribution engine IS continuing to hold in extra heat and energy. Right ?

Please consider your(-collective) bias, that undercurrent of defending your economic/political status quo – and feeling OK about molding your science to fit your vision. Where’s the objectivity? How about a little self skepticism for a change?

What does McIntyre’s hostile, conspiracy ideation rich, belly-button gazing do to help us understand the pragmatic implications of what we are doing to our atmosphere, along with its cascading consequences?

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Steve McIntyre - ClimateAudit smoke'n mirrors - 7/21/2013



Steve McIntyre the mesmerist is at it again, with yet another startling revelation that turns out to add up to nothing new or interesting:

"Results from a Low-Sensitivity Model"
at Climate Audit  |  7/21/2013