Oh the relief, finally, I'm finished! Welcome to the final installment of my review of 1000frolly's malicious YouTube fraud-video. For an introduction to this series visit (1) Profiles in Malicious Deception - 1000frolly.
NASA - The "Mystery" of Antarctic Cooling
Published on Jan 25, 2016 | 1000frolly | 30:04 painful minutes long
1000frolly writes in his description: NASA scientists Walt Meier and Nathan Kurtz are baffled by the "Mystery" of just why the Antarctic simply refuses to warm. {Wrong! Someone simply did an execrable job of putting together that NASAGoddard video. Vital information was left on the cutting room floor!}
Instead, it's been cooling for decades! {Michael Crichton may say so, but he's a dead fiction thriller writer, can't you do better than that?
There's plenty of warming happening on and around Antarctica.}
Their CO2-driven computer models insist that it has to be warming!
It must be! After all; The Science is "Settled" - isn't it? {Yes, Antarctica is warming! Yes, the fundamentals are settled. Actually, models are plenty accurate, just need to be willing to assess them honestly.}
This is the "Mystery of Antarctica"! The "Canary in the Coal Mine"!
I will explain just why the Antarctic refuses to warm {But, he never does.},
and why this means that the Enhanced Carbon Dioxide hypothesis (CAGW) has to be thrown out. {Only by ignoring tons of evidence can one cling to such disconnected nonsense.}
___________________________________________________
Introduction
It's been interesting in a masochistic sort of way, it's helped teach me about "cosmoclimatology" and Antarctica is always fascinating (if sad) to research and I learned a few more facts, such as that eye popping map of Antarctic bottom waters.
But dealing with 1000frolly's words was the heart of this. My ongoing struggle to comprehend how someone can believe and broadcast such cobbled together kindergarden 'science', glued will tons of malicious slander towards honest competent experts.
But dealing with 1000frolly's words was the heart of this. My ongoing struggle to comprehend how someone can believe and broadcast such cobbled together kindergarden 'science', glued will tons of malicious slander towards honest competent experts.
Supported with a gross double standard toward evidentiary expectations. A crank's notions are given more weight than decades worth of Air Force research, followed by literally thousands of scientists and tens of thousands of support staff around globe, studying our planet with ever greater detail and understanding.
All of this is forced through with an attitude of absolute self-certainty and total disregard, nay hostility, towards all contrary information.
___________________________________________________
22:55 - 1000frolly: Let's get back to the Antarctic, (Polyakov et. al 2002b)
Now global circulation models forced by carbon dioxide, as they all are show that both poles should warm far more than tropical regions.{Well yes. Climate models utilize established physics, can't get away from the CO2 reality, any more than you can ignore gravity.}{see #1}
