Pages

▼

Pages

▼
Showing posts with label dissecting debate strategies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dissecting debate strategies. Show all posts
Saturday, December 2, 2017

Announcing "Confronting Science Contrarians" blogspot

›
The title of this blog has received many complaints over the years and I've finally taken steps to remedy that by starting a new blogspo...
Thursday, May 12, 2016

Is CO2Science.org 'criminally negligent'? Why not consider it?

›
Is misinformation about climate science criminally negligent?   I'm reminded of Professor Lawrence Torcello 's question by the dia...
Thursday, March 24, 2016

Reflecting on lawyerly questions

›
There's a YouTube video called, " Mocked Meteorologist Gets Last Laugh - Piers Corbyn Wins Again !"  Hideous five year old, o...
Monday, January 4, 2016

Considering the faith-based mind. What is science's sin?

›
I would suggest an argument could be made that at the core of much of the emotionality of Republican resistance to scientific understandi...
4 comments:
Sunday, January 3, 2016

Considering the heart of faith-based science deniers

›
I would suggest an argument could be made that at the core of much of the emotionality of Republican resistance to scientific understanding...
Sunday, December 13, 2015

Part 8 - sock-puppet calls it like he sees it, Dave sticks to the science.

›
Never say never folks.  They went another round and it's a text book example of the two different  debate  styles in action.  I think...
Saturday, December 12, 2015

part 6 - sock-puppet to Dave: "Absolutely nothing unusual about temp rise in over 120 years"

›
That debate between AL and Dave kept on going, though it might be winding down now. I skipped some earlier posts by Dave to focus on his ...
Tuesday, October 27, 2015

NPR and Brumfiel don't "appreciate" climate engine

›
I don't have any time to do anything with  this, but I was confronted with another inane news story, this time at NPR.   "Why Hurr...
Thursday, June 18, 2015

Considering the two species of debate.

›
          This was inspired by another comment over at Emily Blegvad's global warming documentary " The Science Behind Global Warm...
Wednesday, June 17, 2015

and now the ugly side of the AGW dialogue.

›
{updated with comments June 18 evening.} Here we have Lee Stamper, he's been commenting at YouTube on a video I featured over here on...
5 comments:
Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Odin2 lets debate Fuhai Hong and Xiaojian Zhao "Information Manipulation and Climate Agreements"

›
At EarthSky.org I read a good article yesterday explaining the reasons why the so called " Global warming hiatus never happened ....
Monday, June 8, 2015

CAGW. Ask a simple question, get a revealing answer. Dodging the issue.

›
{edited 11:15 pm} citizenschallenge asks,  "Just what does it take to qualify as a 'catastrophe'?" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I...