What'sUpWithThatWatts, et al.: gender

Friday, February 8, 2013

LaFramboise "Gender" appendix Chapter 5 #1

Appendix #1 - Word Search for "gender"

{#5} D.LaFramboise The Delinquent Author -
"The Right Gender or the Right Country"

Donna LaFramboise made a big deal about the occurrence of "gender" in answers to the InterAcademy Council (IAC) Questionnaire, but when I read through the comments that my "gender" word search came up with collectively they seemed fairly ho-hum, with supportive voices as much as negative ones.

Also worth considering here.
Why do 100% of the authors need to be the best and the brightest.
Who says there isn't room for a small percentage of proteges participating without compromising the quality of the report

Responses to the InterAcademy Council (IAC) Questionnaire

Committee to Review the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

{#5} D.LaFramboise The Delinquent Author - "Gender"

{edited 11/25/2013}

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

{#5} D.LaFramboise The Delinquent Author -
"The Right Gender or the Right Country"

This is chapter five from Donna LaFramboise's book

The Delinquent Teenager: "The Right Gender or the Right Country"

For an introduction explaining why I'm reviewing this piece of work,
please click here.

{Courier font identifies LaFramboise's words

Laframboise, (2011-10-09). T D T W W M W T C E (Kindle Locations 195-201). Ivy Avenue Press. Kindle Edition. }

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Chapter 5 - The Right Gender or the Right Country
In early 2010 the InterAcademy Council, an organization comprised of science bodies from around the world, took an historic step. It established a committee whose purpose was to investigate IPCC policies and procedures.

~ ~ ~

{The report is here: IAC Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC}

Notice how Donna's manipulates her readers with melodramatic wording: "an historic step..."

What's so "historic" about a scientific organization doing a self-audit or having an outside review done by independent experts?

Why doesn't Donna consider the IPCC's rapid evolution from a small advisory group who's roll was to collect and summarize the state of climatological understanding for Governmental bodies and the general public.

RECOMMENDED WEBSITES

{edited 12/11/2014}

I know there are too many typos, what can I say, eyes aren't what they were, I get rushed, and always did have a thing with transposing…{well, I also hated high school "english" classes... bad call that one.}. Doing the best I can with what I got. Embarrassing though it is, it's better than doing nothing. Besides, it's the issues and reasoning that we should be worrying about.

Though I'm in my own little world here, I'm also constantly learning and evolving and do get occasional feedback and when I reread stuff and find errors or omissions or garbage, I fix it. If it's major I'll acknowledge it with an 'edited' note, minor stuff I don't bother.

~ ~ ~

I hardly keep track of Anthony's latest antics (besides, with Sou on the job why bother - can't beat her insights). It's just me over here and I have more important things to do with my precious hours - still now that Anthony's luster has been wearing thin he's put his energy into discovering and honing new fresh faces to carry on the public show of the Republican/Libertarian strategic attack on science.

He seems to have transitioned into a ring-leader, perhaps mentor/coach would be better, producer? At least that's how Mr. Steele and his antics of the past year has gotten me to think about it. So in that regard this blog remains about WUWT's brand of thinking and logic and my struggle to understand the anatomy of the fraud they've perpetrated against mankind. {December 2014}

_____________________________

ok, now some recommended websites:

This blog was started in April 2013 and is written by an actual scientist so it has a refreshingly serious objective air to it, plus he does a good clear job of explaining complex issues.

And Then There's Physics.
~ ~ ~

Sou has some of the best {readability and detailed} examinations of Watt's antics I've seen - and she does have fun with certain characters.

She continues be the best at keeping up with Mr. Watts' and pals and their many deceptions.

The recent dirty tricks and attacks she is enduring are acknowledgment of how good she is at it.

http://blog.hotwhopper.com

~ ~ ~

Ben has been documenting Anthony's misdeeds longer than the rest of us.

http://wottsupwiththat.com

~ ~ ~

Tamino, an acknowledged statistical/mathematical expert of the highest order, at Open Mind also does an excellent job of holding Anthony’s feet to the fire with clearly explained facts and math. Check it out:
http://tamino.wordpress.com
~ ~ ~

And of course, there is the excellent, most up to date internet depository of climate studies and information for the non-expert public.

http://SkepticalScience.com

~ ~ ~

Then there's RealClimate.org the scientist's commentary site. Run by working climate scientists intended to help the interested public and journalists sort through the complexities of the climatology. They provide "quick response to developing stories and provide the context" that is too often missing from public media's depiction. {But, you better be serious and have some real science education/understanding under your belt if you want to keep up.}

http://realclimate.org

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I remember back in da day, good websites/blogs were few and far between. But over the past years that's been changing to the point that it's impossible to keep up with them all. Here's an incomplete, and long overdue addition to my above list: