This is both my personal learning project and my contribution in the struggle to confront the ongoing Republican/ libertarian assault on rational science and constructive learning, as manifested in their malicious strategic Attacks on Science ~ A collection of articles, scientific resources, plus my own essays and indepth critique of various presentations from unidirectional-skeptics ~ Hopefully a resource for the busy, yet discerning, student who's concerned about the health of our Earth
Showing posts with label why start this blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label why start this blog. Show all posts
Saturday, January 2, 2016
About this blog and me
I'll start 2016 with some rambling about this blog and where I'm coming from.
Back in 2011 I started commenting at Anthony Watts' blog, WattsUpWithThat. I did it with trepidation since I knew Mr. Watts had quite the reputation for banning skeptical commenters regarding his insinuations and pronouncements. I tried being rational and civil, but the contrarian tactic of baiting to divert the conversation must have suckered me over his tolerance-line for alarmists and I found myself joining his legion of the banned and effectively being censored from his online "debate". Ironically his compatriots seem to have no limits on the hysteria, insults and fabricated claims they are allowed to inject - oh but you better not confront them with facts, that's unacceptable in their echo-chamber "debate."
What's a little go-getter to do? Roll over for Anthony? Why? When I could respond with a blog of my own. Thus, "What's Up With That Watts et.al" was born. Dedicated to examining contrarian claims; learning about their debate tactics; confronting their arguments with reason and links to authoritative sources for learning; and sharing that information with other concerned students and citizens. Deep down I was also hoping to spur some dialogue with other like minded individuals, perhaps even encourage some to engage in the public "debate" themselves.
Saturday, October 17, 2015
ClimateAudit. . .“Citizenschallenge” has no CV
Something has come up that's inspired me to repost this explanation of "who I think I am" and why I invest the time and effort to continue posting here at WUWTW.
Originally posted in February 2014
__________________________________________________________
I'd like to share my response to an observation someone made over at ClimateAudit -
Consider it a sort of bio piece.
{slightly improved.}
For starters I have never claimed to be a scientist, nor grad! That's why, when I state my opinions I make a point of supporting my assertions by sharing the authoritative sources I base them on. My hope is that curious people will go to original sources and start learning for themselves - the evidence speaks for itself.
As for CV,
Originally posted in February 2014
__________________________________________________________
I'd like to share my response to an observation someone made over at ClimateAudit -
Consider it a sort of bio piece.
{slightly improved.}
dbs... Posted Jan 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM :
“Citizenschallenge” has no CV.(Response Posted Feb 2, 2014 at 1:11 AM) dbs,
For starters I have never claimed to be a scientist, nor grad! That's why, when I state my opinions I make a point of supporting my assertions by sharing the authoritative sources I base them on. My hope is that curious people will go to original sources and start learning for themselves - the evidence speaks for itself.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
ClimateAudit. . .“Citizenschallenge” has no CV
I'd like to share my response to an observation someone made over at ClimateAudit -
Consider it a sort of bio piece.
{slightly improved.}
dbs... Posted Jan 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM :
“Citizenschallenge” has no CV.(Response Posted Feb 2, 2014 at 1:11 AM) dbs,
For starters I have never claimed to be a scientist, nor grad! That's why, when I state my opinions I make a point of supporting my assertions by sharing the authoritative sources I base them on. My hope is that curious people will go to original sources and start learning for themselves - the evidence speaks for itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)