I think I finally cracked LaFramboise's Fallacy.
She projects that "scientific literature" is supposedly the same as "peer reviewed literature" something that is decidedly false!
Working Group 3, Chapter 1 of the 2007 IPCC report
IPPC references = 14..................28%
Government Study/Report = 14..................28%
Authoritative Sources = 10..................20%
Peer-reviewed (LaFramboise) = 12..................24%
Quite the political theater Donna, the single-minded procecutor, has pulled off here.
Besides ignoring the realities of centuries worth of scientific process actually work; she then substitutes her expectation of some utter perfection or the right to scream frauds.
Now she thinks she can scream 'false-advertising' and fraud because authoritative Government and ENG studies, are included on the citation list for the IPCC chapters, or that some citations are reference back to other IPCC sections.
As if pure numbers makes a report.
When Pachauri and other officials say IPCC bases all their findings on peer reviewed literature.
That does not mean that every single item cited in the final IPCC reports is going to be out of a peer-reviewed journal.
Think about it. Citations are a list of everything included in the discussion! That does not mean the paper wasn't based on a core of peer-reviewed literature. Get it?
For instance, 28% of the citations to WG3Ch1 are note's back to other IPCC sections.
Donna claims all that is garbage; and an excuse to demonize the IPCC.
Why?
Because those citations are not straight out of a peer reviewed journal?
That's crazy-making Donna!
Donna, not every item being cited carries the same weight. Items are on that list simply because they were part of the discussion.
Beyond that, please consider what Donna writes off as worthless:
official government reports;
along with reports from authoritative industry and long established multi-government research based consortium.
These are entities with proven track records... you know. Once you toss all of that out the window you're left with nothing but a new dark ages of anarchy. And all because the WUWTzers and skepticans don't have the will to honestly face what society is doing to it's life-sustaining atmosphere... and what that means for our future.
Shame on the whole bunch of 'em.
Besides ignoring the realities of centuries worth of scientific process actually work; she then substitutes her expectation of some utter perfection or the right to scream frauds.
Now she thinks she can scream 'false-advertising' and fraud because authoritative Government and ENG studies, are included on the citation list for the IPCC chapters, or that some citations are reference back to other IPCC sections.
As if pure numbers makes a report.
When Pachauri and other officials say IPCC bases all their findings on peer reviewed literature.
That does not mean that every single item cited in the final IPCC reports is going to be out of a peer-reviewed journal.
Think about it. Citations are a list of everything included in the discussion! That does not mean the paper wasn't based on a core of peer-reviewed literature. Get it?
For instance, 28% of the citations to WG3Ch1 are note's back to other IPCC sections.
Donna claims all that is garbage; and an excuse to demonize the IPCC.
Why?
Because those citations are not straight out of a peer reviewed journal?
That's crazy-making Donna!
Donna, not every item being cited carries the same weight. Items are on that list simply because they were part of the discussion.
Beyond that, please consider what Donna writes off as worthless:
official government reports;
along with reports from authoritative industry and long established multi-government research based consortium.
These are entities with proven track records... you know. Once you toss all of that out the window you're left with nothing but a new dark ages of anarchy. And all because the WUWTzers and skepticans don't have the will to honestly face what society is doing to it's life-sustaining atmosphere... and what that means for our future.
Shame on the whole bunch of 'em.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
JoNova praising LaFramboise's "IPCC audit"
"As usual, it’s honest volunteers who have conscientiously tested the IPCC by going through 18,500 references. And the final total? Fully 5,600, or 30% of their references are not peer reviewed."
In The Delinquent Teenager, Donna says:
"I counted the references in the chapter Tol had mentioned. Next I split them into two groups: journal articles and everything else. Non-peer-reviewed material is often called grey literature and it seemed to me there were 139 in this category. That meant only 58% of the source material had come from peer-reviewed publications. This is a long way from 100%. Anyone who thinks it isn't should keep only 58% of their next paycheque and donate the remainder to charity. "
"I counted the references in the chapter Tol had mentioned. Next I split them into two groups: journal articles and everything else. Non-peer-reviewed material is often called grey literature and it seemed to me there were 139 in this category. That meant only 58% of the source material had come from peer-reviewed publications. This is a long way from 100%. Anyone who thinks it isn't should keep only 58% of their next paycheque and donate the remainder to charity. "
"These reviewer comments, paired with responses from IPCC authors, suggest that everyone was taking part in a shared hallucination. A great deal of lip service got paid to peer review, but in practice it was a next-to-meaningless concept."
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Not a second thought.
That may be fine for a bare knuckles political battle - but if learning is the goal we need to ask ourselves about all that Donna wants the IPCC to ignore.
I decided to do my own audit of LaFramboise's IPCC peer-review audit and was shocked at Donna's deception.
Color code:
IPPC references = 14..................28%
Government Study/Report = 14..................28%
Authoritative Sources = 10..................20%
Peer-reviewed (LaFramboise) = 12..................24%
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1. - IPPC references
Baker, T., H. Pan, J. Kohler, R. Warren, and S. Winne, 2006: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change by Inducing Technological Progress: Scenarios Using a Large-Scale Econometric Model. In Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, H.J. Schellnhuber (editor in chief), Cambridge University Press, pp. 361-371.
~ ~ ~
This is the definitive source for information on mitigation of climate change, circa 2007. As with all IPCC assessment reports, only 'established science' can be included, which means that the latest scientific results are generally not included (this policy has advantages and disadvantages, the primary advantage is that the science presented in IPCC reports is unlikely to be contested or refuted by later research). Note that all IPCC reports are available as individual pdf files at: http://www.ipcc.ch/
Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group ... - Page 115 - Google Books Result
books.google.com/books?isbn=0521880114
Bert Metz, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - 2007 - Science
REFERENCES Baker, T., H. Pan, J. Kohler, R. Warren, and S. Winne, 2006: Avoiding ... Technological Progress: Scenarios Using a Large-Scale Econometric Model. In Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, H.J. Schellnhuber (editor in chief ), ... C., Grubb, M. and Koehler, J., 2006: Induced Technological Change: Exploring ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2. - Peer-reviewed
Bolin, B. and H.S. Kheshgi, 2001: On strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 24 April, 2001, 98(9), pp. 4850-4854.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3. - Governments Study/Report
CEC, 2006: Report from the Commission: Progress Towards Achieving the Kyoto Objectives. SEC(2006) 1412, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
4. - Government Study/Report
CEU, 2005: Presidency Conclusions - Brussels, 22 and 23 March 2005 - IV. Climate Change, European Commission, Council of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium. accessed 25 April 2006.
~ ~ ~
http://www.eu2005.lu/en/actualites/conseil/2005/03/23conseileuropen/ceconcl.pdf
The meeting was preceded by a presentation given by Mr Josep Borrell,President of the European Parliament,followed by an exchange of views. The President of the Commission took the opportunity to present the Commission's strategic objectives for 2005-2009. The Heads of State or Government took note and welcomed the close agreement between the Council,the European Parliament and the Commission on the Union's priorities,particularly with regard to legislative activity for the coming years.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5. - Authoritative Sources
Chandler, W., R. Schaeffer, Z. Dadi, P.R. Shukla, F. Tudela, O. Davidson and S. Alpan-Atamer, 2002: Climate change mitigation in developing countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
6. - Governments Study/Report
Dasgupta, P., 2006: Comments on the Stern Review’s Economics of Climate Change. <http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/dasgupta/STERN.pdf> accessed 15. December 2006.
~ ~ ~
Comments on the Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change* by ...econ.tau.ac.il/.../Partha%20Dasgupta%20on%20Stern%20Revi...ShareFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick Viewby SP Dasgupta - 2006 - Cited by 301 -
* These comments were prepared for a seminar on the Stern Review's Economics of Climate
Change, organised by the Foundation for Science and Technology at the Royal Society, London,
on November 8, 2006. The Review is a long and impressive document. The authors have put together much that is now known about the effects of carbon emissions on human well-being and they remind readers of those matters that are very unknown. It is possible though that readers will not notice that the authors have treated one important aspect of the Review's economic analysis cavalierly. The comments that follow are directed at that aspect.
Royal Society, London
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
7. - IPPC references
Denman, K.L., G. Brasseur, A. Chidthaisong, P. Ciais, P.M. Cox, R.E. Dickinson, D. Hauglustaine, C. Heinze, E. Holland, D. Jacob, U. Lohmann, S Ramachandran, P.L. da Silva Dias, S.C. Wofsy and X. Zhang, 2007: Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
8. - Peer-reviewed
Edenhofer, O., Lessmann, K., Kemfert, C., Grubb, M. and Koehler, J., 2006: Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilisation. Synthesis Report from the Innovation Modelling Comparison Exercise. In Endogenous Technological Change and the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilisation, O. Edenhofer, C. Carraro, J. Köhler, M. Grubb. The Energy Journal, Special Issue #1.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
9. - Government Study/Report
EEA, 2006: EN09_EU-25_Policy_effectiveness (Underpinning Energy and Environment indicator fact-sheets for Energy and environment in the European Union - Tracking progress towards integration, EEA Report No 8/2006). European Environment Agency.
~ ~ ~
U.S. DOE, Energy Information Administration
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
10. - Government Study/Report
EIA, 2006a: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., 20585, <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/crude1.html>, accessed 15. December 2006.
~ ~ ~
U.S. DOE, Energy Information Administration
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
11. - Government Study/Report
EIA, 2006b: International Energy Outlook 2006. DOE/EIA-0484(2006), U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., 20585.
~ ~ ~
U.S. DOE, Energy Information Administration
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
12. - Authoritative Sources
Eichhammer, W., F. Gagelmann, J. Schleich and J. Chesshire, 2002: Reasons and Perspectives for Emission Reductions in Germany and the UK. Fraunhofer Institute, <http://www.isi.fhg.de/publ/downloads/isi02a08/emission-reduction.pdf>, accessed 24 January 2007.
~ ~ ~
AbstractThis paper analyses the causes for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by more than 18 % in Germany and by about 12 % in the UK between 1990 and 2000. It further investigates the prospects for both countries to fulfill their Kyoto target in the "first commitment period" and for potential stricter commitments thereafter. The main findings indicate that, in both countries, in the past decade, policy efforts accounted for more than 50 % of the reduction of the six Kyoto-gases, and for about 40 % of the reduction of Co2 emissions compared to "business as usual" development. . . "
Permalink: http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-15338.html
Fraunhofer Institute - http://www.fraunhofer.de/en.html
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
13. - Government Study/Report
Eichhammer, W., U. Boede, F. Gagelmann, E. Jochem, J. Schleich, B. Schlomann, J. Chesshire and H-J. Ziesing, 2001: Greenhouse Gas Reductions in Germany and the UK - Coincidence or Policy Induced. An analysis for international climate policy. Fraunhofer Institute, Science Policy and Technology Research (SPRU), Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW). <http://www.isi.fhg.de/publ/downloads/isi01b20/greenhouse-gas.pdf>, accessed 20. April 2006.
~ ~ ~
Study on behalf of the
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
14. - Authoritative Sources
EMF, 2004: Energy Modeling Forum Study 21: Multi-gas Mitigation Scenarios. Energy Modeling Forum, <http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF>, accessed 10. December 2006.
~ ~ ~
http://emf.stanford.edu/files/pubs/22519/SpecialIssueEMF21.pdfThe Energy JournalOverview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate PolicyJohn P. Weyant, Francisco C. de la Chesnaye, and Geoff J. Blanford1. INTRODUCTIONThis Special Issue of The Energy Journal presents the results of the most recently completed international collaboration under Stanford University’s Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)1. The EMF was started in 1976 as an organized forum for discussion and evaluation of important energy and environmental issues. The EMF operates mainly around organized working groups that focus their work by comparing the results of different economic, market, and planning models. Participants in EMF are leading energy and economics experts and advisors from industry, universities, government, and other research organizations.
On the topic of climate change mitigation, recent EMF working groups include: EMF-16, The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, which was a comprehensive comparison of 13 international modeling teams of the protocol and also published as a special issue of The Energy Journal (Weyant, 1999); and EMF-19, which evaluated alternative technology strategies for climate change policy and resulted in a special issue of Energy Economics (Weyant, 2004).
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
15. - IPPC references
Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D.W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D.C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz and R. Van Dorland, 2007: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
~ ~ ~
IPCC Chapter 2: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative ...
www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2.htmlShare
Climate Change 2007: Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis ... Forster, P. , V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D.W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D.C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz and R. Van Dorland, 2007: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing.
Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group ... - Page 115 - Google Books Result
books.google.com/books?isbn=0521880114
Bert Metz, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - 2007 - Science
In: Technological change and the environment, A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, W.D. Nordhaus, (eds.). Resources for the Future, pp. 251-279.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
16. - IPPC references
Gritsevsky, A., and N. Nakicenovic, 2002: Modelling uncertainty of induced technological change. In: Technological change and the environment, A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, W.D. Nordhaus, (eds.). Resources for the Future, pp. 251-279.
~ ~ ~
Climate Change 2007 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group ... - Page 115 - Google Books Resultbooks.google.com/books?isbn=0521880114Bert Metz, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - 2007 - ScienceIn: Technological change and the environment, A. Grubler, N. Nakicenovic, W.D. Nordhaus, (eds.). Resources for the Future, pp. 251-279.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
17. - Peer-reviewed
Hansen, J., M. Sato, R. Ruedy, K. Lo, D.W. Lea, and M. Medina-Elizade, 2006: Global temperature change. PNAS: 0606291103.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
18. - Peer-reviewed
Harvey, L.D.D., 2007: Dangerous Anthropogenic Interference, Dangerous Climatic Change, and Harmful Climate Change: Non Trivial Distinctions with Significant Policy Implications. Climate Change, 82(1-2), pp.1-25. <http://www.springerlink.com/content/k761w23w3506/> accessed 07/06/07.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
19. - Authoritative Sources
Hooijer, A., M. Silvius, H. Wösten, and S. Page, 2006: PEAT- CO2, Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943.
~ ~ ~
Mission report geohydrology - Wetlands Internationalwww.wetlands.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket...tabid=56ShareFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick ViewReport R&D projects Q3943 / Q3684 / Q4142. 2006 ... Delft Hydraulics report Q3943 (2006) .... The PEAT-CO2 project was started in 2005 by Delft Hydraulics in ...PEAT - CO2 Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peat lands in SE AsiaReport R&D projects Q3943 / Q3684 / Q4142, 2006
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
20. - Government Study/Report
IEA, 2005: Energy Technologies at the cutting edge. International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
~ ~ ~
International Energy Agency
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
21. - Government Study/Report
IEA, 2006a: World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris, France.
~ ~ ~
International Energy Agency
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
22. - Government Study/Report
IEA, 2006b: Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris, France.
~ ~ ~
International Energy Agency
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
23. - IPPC references
IPCC, 1991: The First Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
24. - IPPC references
IPCC, 1996: The Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
25. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2000a: Emissions Scenarios. [Nakicenovic, N. and R. Swart (eds.)]. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 570 pp.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
26. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2000b: Guidance papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [R. Pachauri, T. Taniguchi and K. Tanaka (eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
27. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: Mitigation - Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [Metz, B., O. Davidson, R. Swart, and J. Pan (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 700 pp.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
28. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2005: Safeguarding the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate System: issues related to Hydrofluorocarbons and Perfluorocarbons [Metz, B., L. Kuijpers, S. Solomon, S.O. Andersen, O. Davidson, J. Pons, D.de Jager, T. Kestin, M. Manning, and L. Meyer (eds.)]. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
29. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2007a: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B.M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
30. - IPPC references
IPCC, 2007b: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Parry, M.L., O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
31. - Authoritative Sources
JISF, 2005; Japan Iron and Steel federation <http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/activity/050715.html>, accessed 15. July 2006.
~ ~ ~
Japan Iron and Steel FederationThis is the Japanese Iron and Steel industry organization - their statistics are authoritative.http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/statistics/report/index.html
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
33. - Authoritative Sources
Kaul, I., I. Grunberg, and M.A. Stern, 1999: Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press 1999.
~ ~ ~
Description http://nvs.sagepub.com/content/30/3/588.refs
This collection offers a new rationale and framework for international development cooperation. Its main argument is that in actual practice, development cooperation has already moved beyond aid (i.e. assistance to poor countries) and onto issues such as the ozone hole, global climate change, HIV, drug trafficking, and financial volatility. These issues are not poverty-related but instead concern global housekeeping, which helps to ensure an adequate provision of global public goods. Contributors include Amartya Sen, the 1998 Nobel Laureate in Economics, Jeffrey Sachs of the Harvard Institute for International Development, Joseph Stiglitz of the World Bank, and many others.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
34. - Authoritative Sources
Kaul, I., P. Conceiçao, K. Le Gouven, and R.U. Mendoz, 2003: Providing Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press.
~ ~ ~
http://nvs.sagepub.com/content/30/3/588.refsGlobal Public Goods: What Role for Civil Society?
AbstractThis article draws attention to the importance of public goods for the well-being of people, including, as a means toward this end, for the efficiency of markets. The author suggests that as a result of globalization, a growing number of public goods have assumed cross-border dimensions and become global public goods (GPGs). They can no longer be adequately provided through domestic policy action alone but require international cooperation for their adequate provision. The author argues that for globalization to work for all, it is important for civil society organizations (CSOs) to become more systematically involved in international negotiations and cooperation and to facilitate closer linkages between domestic policy making and international cooperation. Six policy options are discussed that could strengthen the role of CSOs in the provision of GPGs and in achieving more balanced and sustainable development.
- United Nations Development Programme
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
34. - Authoritative Sources
Kaya, Yoichi, 1990: Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Paris.
~ ~ ~
KAYA WORKING PAPER_rev13forweb - MITweb.mit.edu/ipc/publications/pdf/09-006.pdfShare File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick Viewby RK Lester - 2009 - Cited by 6 - Related articles(Kaya, Y., “Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed. Scenarios”, Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry ...~ ~ ~ Emissions Scenarios
www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=48Share
Kaya, Y., 1990: Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and ...
~ ~ ~
[BOOK] Environment, energy, and economy: strategies for sustainability
Y Kaya, K Yokobori - 1997 - books.google.com
... Page 6. Page 7. Environment, energy, and economy: Strategies for sustainability Edited by
Yoichi Kaya and Keiichi Yokobori United Nations University Press TOKYO• NEW YORK• PARIS
ona JNTG-2KF-UKT4 Page 8. ... Yoichi Kaya Keiichi Yokobori Page 15. ...
~ ~ ~
Do GoogleScholar search on the man.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
35. - Government Study/Report
Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R.J. Andres, 2006: Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. In Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA.
~ ~ ~
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
36. - Peer-reviewed
Mastrandrea, M.D., and S.H. Schneider, 2004: Probabilistic Integrated Assessment of ‘Dangerous’ Climate Change. Science, 304(5670), pp. 571-575.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
37. - IPPC references
Meehl, G.A., T.F. Stocker, W.D. Collins, P. Friedlingstein, A.T. Gaye, J.M. Gregory, A. Kitoh, R. Knutti, J.M. Murphy, A. Noda, S.C.B. Raper, I.G. Watterson, A.J. Weaver and Z.-C. Zhao, 2007: Global Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
38. - Government Study/Report
Nordhaus, W.D., 2006: The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 12741. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
~ ~ ~
The Stern Review
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
39. - Peer-reviewed
Olivier, J.G.J., J.A. Van Aardenne, F. Dentener, V. Pagliari, L.N. Ganzeveld, and J.A.H.W. Peters, 2005: Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: regional trends 1970-2000 and spatial distribution of key sources in 2000. Environmental Science, 2(2-3), pp. 81-99. DOI: 10.1080/15693430500400345. <http://www.mnp.nl/edgar/global_overview/>, accessed 5. December 2006.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
40. - Authoritative Sources
Olivier, J.G.J., T. Pulles and J.A. van Aardenne, 2006: Part III: Greenhouse gas emissions: 1. Shares and trends in greenhouse gas emissions; 2. Sources and Methods; Greenhouse gas emissions for 1990, 1995 and 2000. In CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971-2004, 2006 Edition, pp. III.1-III.
~ ~ ~
https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/edcnrp/index.php/EDGARThe EDGAR database is commonly used by many Scientific Institutes, Research Centres, Environmental Agencies, Universities, etc.Identified scientific users, among others:
- Members of the Netherlands Centre for Climate Research (CKO), e.g. IMAU (e.g. Houweling et al., 2000; Roelofs and Lelieveld, 2000)
- Max Planck Institute Mainz (Lawrence et al., 1999a; Lawrence and Crutzen, 1999)
- Historical emission inventories of EDGAR/HYDE (Den Elzen et al., 1999)
- Integrated N assessments using NH3, NOx and N2O inventories (Olivier et al., 1998)
- MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, e.g. in the Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model (Mayer et al., 2000)
- Other NRP-MLK projects: e.g. emission reductions for non-CO2 greenhouse gases by De Jager et al.; validation of CH4 emissions in Northwest Europe by Berdowski et al.; and CH4 from rice fields in Asia by Denier van der Gon et al.).
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
41. - Peer-reviewed
Pacala, S. and R. Socolow, 2004: Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. Science, 305, pp. 968-972.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
42. - Peer-reviewed
Ramankutty, N., et al., 2006: Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation. Global Change Biology (published article online: 28-Nov-2006 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01272.x).
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
43. - Authoritative Sources
Rijsberman, F.J., and R.J. Swart (eds.), 1990: Targets and Indicators of Climate Change. Stockholm Environment Institute, 1666 pp.
~ ~ ~
http://www.climateemergencyinstitute.com/uploads/1990_one.pdf
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
44. - IPPC references
Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, R.B. Alley, T. Berntsen, N.L. Bindoff, Z. Chen, A. Chidthaisong, J.M. Gregory, G.C. Hegerl, M. Heimann, B. Hewitson, B.J. Hoskins, F. Joos, J. Jouzel, V. Kattsov, U. Lohmann, T. Matsuno, M. Molina, N. Nicholls, J.Overpeck, G. Raga, V. Ramaswamy, J. Ren, M. Rusticucci, R. Somerville, T.F. Stocker, P. Whetton, R.A. Wood and D. Wratt, 2007: Technical Summary. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
~ ~ ~
IPCC
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
45. - Government Study/Report
Stern, N., 2006: The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. <http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/stern_review_report.cf>, accessed 28. November 2006.
~ ~ ~
The Stern Review
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
46. - Peer-reviewed
Sun, J.W., 1998: Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decomposition model. Energy Economics 20(1), pp. 85-100.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
47. - Peer-reviewed
Sun, J.W. and B.W. Ang, 2000: Some properties of an exact energy decomposition model. Energy 25(12), pp. 1177-1188.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
48. - Peer-reviewed
Tokushige, K., K. Akimoto, and T. Tomoda, 2006: Public Acceptance and Risk-benefit Perception of CO2 Geological Storage for Global Warming Mitigation in Japan, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. <http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/fj451l10258r3259/?p=7fa647f50f534>871b6234fdde58fac6a&pi=0> accessed January 10, 2007.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
49. - Government Study/Report
UN, 1992: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations, New York.
~ ~ ~
1992: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
50. Van der Werf, G.R., J.T. Randerson, G.J. Collatz, and L. Giglio, 2003: Carbon emissions from fires in tropical and subtropical ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 9, pp. 547-562.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Total
Peer-reviewed (LaFramboise) = 12..................24%
IPPC references = 14..................28%
Government Study/Report = 14..................28%
Authoritative Sources = 10..................20%
Working Group 3, Chapter 1 of the 2007 IPCC report
audited by Tim Hulsey, 13 March 2010
total number of references: 50
peer-reviewed references, highlighted in yellow: 12
percentage of chapter references from peer-reviewed literature: 24.00 percent
chapter references: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg3/en/ch1s1-references.html
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Footnotes
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
5. - Authoritative Sources
Chandler, W., R. Schaeffer, Z. Dadi, P.R. Shukla, F. Tudela, O. Davidson and S. Alpan-Atamer, 2002: Climate change mitigation in developing countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
The Energy Citations Database (ECD) provides free access to over 2,494,000 science research citations with continued growth through regular updates. There are over 314,000 full-text documents, primarily from 1943 forward, available via the database. Citations and documents are made publicly available by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
ECD includes scientific and technical research results in disciplines of interest to DOE such as chemistry, physics, materials, environmental science, geology, engineering, mathematics, climatology, oceanography, and computer science. It includes bibliographic citations to report literature, conference papers, journal articles, books, dissertations, and patents.
ECD was created and developed by DOE’s Office of Scientific and Technical Information with the science-attentive citizen in mind. It contains energy and energy‑related scientific and technical information collected by the Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies, the Energy Research & Development Administration (ERDA) and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC).
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
6. - Governments Study/Report
Dasgupta, P., 2006: Comments on the Stern Review’s Economics of Climate Change. <http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/faculty/dasgupta/STERN.pdf> accessed 15. December 2006.
* These comments were prepared for a seminar on the Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change, organised by the Foundation for Science and Technology at the Royal Society, London, on November 8, 2006. The Review is a long and impressive document.
The authors have put together much that is now known about the effects of carbon emissions on human well-being and they remind readers of those matters that are very unknown. It is possible though that readers will not notice that the authors have treated one important aspect of the Review's economic analysis cavalierly. The comments that follow are directed at that aspect.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern_Review
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
10. - Government Study/Report
EIA, 2006a: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C., 20585, <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/crude1.html>, accessed 15. December 2006.
http://www.eia.gov/countries/The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. {introductory video http://www.eia.gov/conf_videos/video/video.html}
Our Work
EIA provides a wide range of information and data products covering energy production, stocks, demand, imports, exports, and prices; and prepares analyses and special reports on topics of current interest.
Our Organization
EIA has four Assistant Administrators directing program functions for energy statistics, energy analysis, communications, and resource and technology management.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
12. - Authoritative Sources
Eichhammer, W., F. Gagelmann, J. Schleich and J. Chesshire, 2002: Reasons and Perspectives for Emission Reductions in Germany and the UK. Fraunhofer Institute, <http://www.isi.fhg.de/publ/downloads/isi02a08/emission-reduction.pdf>, accessed 24 January 2007.
http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/isi-publ/2002/isi02a08/emission-reduction.pdf?WSESSIONID=5712ff2ca5ffcf0d9590afc8ef7e1486
The Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI conducts applied research in seven Competence Centers with a total of 22 Business Units and sees itself as an independent institute for society, politics and industry. Our expertise in the area of innovation research is based on the synergy of the technical, economic and social science knowledge of our staff members. In our work we apply not only a broad spectrum of advanced scientific theories, models, methods and social-science measurement instruments, but continually develop them further, utilizing the empirical findings from the research projects conducted.
On behalf of our customers we investigate the scientific, economic, ecological, social, organizational, legal and political framework conditions for generating innovations and their implications. We use scientifically based analysis, evaluation and forecasting methods. Our assessments of the potentials and limitations of technical, organizational or institutional innovations help decision-makers from industry, academia and politics in making strategic decisions and thus assist them in creating a favorable environment for innovations. Thus Fraunhofer ISI one of the leading innovation research institutes in Europe.
Fraunhofer ISI is a member in the Fraunhofer Materials and Components Group, guest institute in the Fraunhofer Group for Defense and Security and in several alliances:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
EMF, 2004: Energy Modeling Forum Study 21: Multi-gas Mitigation Scenarios. Energy Modeling Forum, <http://www.stanford.edu/group/EMF>, accessed 10. December 2006.
http://emf.stanford.edu/docs/about_emf/
The Forum Seeks to:
- improve understanding of an important energy/environment problem by harnessing the collective capabilities of participating experts
- explain the strengths, limitations and caveats of alternative analytical approaches, and
- identify high priority directions for future research.
The value of our approach has been widely recognized by business and government leaders in the energy and climate change areas. The United States Association for Energy Economics recognized the Forum with the prestigious Adelman-Frankel Award for its “unique and innovative contribution to the field of energy economics.” You may also be interested in reading what a former member of the U.S. Council of Economic Advisors said about the Forum’s work on global climate change.
Leading Institutions
EMF is an international forum for sharing and facilitating discussions on energy policy and global climate issues among experts.
Participating leading institutions from around the world include:
|
|
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hooijer, A., M. Silvius, H. Wösten, and S. Page, 2006: PEAT- CO2, Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943.
http://www.deltares.nl/en
http://www.deltares.nl/en/about-deltaresAbout DeltaresDeltares is an independent, institute for applied research in the field of water, subsurface and infrastructure. Throughout the world, we work on smart solutions, innovations and applications for people, environment and society. Our main focus is on deltas, coastal regions and river basins. Managing these densely populated and vulnerable areas is complex, which is why we work closely with governments, businesses, other research institutes and universities at home and abroad. Our motto is Enabling Delta Life. As an applied research institute, the success of Deltares can be measured in the extent to which our expert knowledge can be used in and for society. For Deltares the quality of our expertise and advice is foremost. Knowledge is our core business.All contracts and projects, whether financed privately or from strategic research budgets, contribute to the consolidation of our knowledge base. Furthermore, we believe in openness and transparency, as is evident from the free availability of our software and models. Open source works, is our firm conviction. Deltares employs over 800 people and is based in Delft and Utrecht.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
31. - Authoritative Sources
JISF, 2005; Japan Iron and Steel federation <http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/activity/050715.html>, accessed 15. July 2006.
~ ~ ~
Japan Iron and Steel FederationThis is the Japanese Iron and Steel industry organization - their statistics are authoritative.http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/http://www.jisf.or.jp/en/statistics/report/index.html
I don't know... but,
I think there's a good chance these actually are peer-reviewed, I'm trying to figure it out.
======================================================
Kaul, I., I. Grunberg, and M.A. Stern, 1999: Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press 1999.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
33. - Authoritative Sources Kaul, I., P. Conceiçao, K. Le Gouven, and R.U. Mendoz, 2003: Providing Global Public Goods, Oxford University Press.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
34. - Authoritative Sources Kaya, Yoichi, 1990: Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, Paris.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Olivier, J.G.J., T. Pulles and J.A. van Aardenne, 2006: Part III: Greenhouse gas emissions: 1. Shares and trends in greenhouse gas emissions; 2. Sources and Methods; Greenhouse gas emissions for 1990, 1995 and 2000. In CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 1971-2004, 2006 Edition, pp. III.1-III.
https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/edcnrp/index.php/Main_Page{ Also see: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/edcnrp/index.php/EDGAR}
The Environmental Data Centre on Natural Resources and on Products (EDCNRP) is your gateway to information related to the environmental thematic areas of sustainable use of natural resources and products. This web-based system provides information for the following types: Metadata (contextual information), Data, Indicators, and Assessments.
The overall policy objective in these thematic area is to reduce environmental impacts associated with natural resource use and products in Europe.
Eurostat as the leader of the Environmental Data Centres on Natural Resources and Products is supposed to coordinate the European institutions which host information related to the above mentioned policy areas in order to create a "single entry point" for DG ENV to gather information for their policy making.
The following institutions are 'holders' of information related to the thematic area of sustainable use of resources and products (so-called "Group of Four", Go4):
1. Eurostat (leading institution): Environmental Statistics and Accounts
2. European Environment Agency (EEA) and its Environmental Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (ETC/SCP)
3. European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC):
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (JRC-IES) with its European Platform on LCA; Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS)
4. DG Environment
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
43. - Authoritative Sources
Rijsberman, F.J., and R.J. Swart (eds.), 1990: Targets and Indicators of Climate Change. Stockholm Environment Institute, 1666 pp.
Stockholm Environment Institute,http://www.sei-international.org
SEI at a glance
SEI is an independent international research institute. We have been engaged in environment and development issues at local, national, regional and global policy levels for more than 20 years.
SEI was formally established in 1989 by the Swedish Government and celebrated its 20th anniversary in October 2009. The Institute has established a reputation for rigorous and objective scientific analysis in the field of environment and development.
Our goal is to bring about change for sustainable development by bridging science and policy. We do this by providing integrated analysis that supports decision makers.
How we work
We believe that scientific insights can guide us through change and should inform decision making and public policy. We also believe that local knowledge and values are crucial in building sustainable lives. Our approach is often highly collaborative, and stakeholder involvement has always been at the heart of SEI’s work. Our projects help to build capacity and strengthen institutions to equip our partners for the long-term.
Our researchers are gathered into four thematic teams that tackle overarching issues like climate change, energy systems, vulnerability and governance, as well as specific problems such as water resources and air pollution. Our work on energy scenarios, sustainability modelling and vulnerability assessments has gained particular recognition.
SEI is an innovator, and has consistently shown the vision to confront issues before they enter the mainstream: our pioneering work on renewable energy and sustainable sanitation has its roots in the early days of the Institute.
What makes us different
We combine the qualities of:
- a non-profit and non-partisan research institute
- an honest broker in handling complex environmental, developmental and social issues
- a research institute committed to rigorous and objective scientific analysis to support improved policymaking
SEI’s five-year strategy and four research themes
- an agent for change that promotes transitions to a more sustainable world.
Our five-year strategy for 2010–2014 is founded on a wide-ranging consultation with partners and stakeholders around the world. The strategy takes a global outlook on the next decade’s key environment and development challenges, and focuses on where SEI’s competence can best meet these challenges and advance sustainable development.
To this end, we have transformed SEI’s previous research programmes into four overarching themes:
These themes will enable us to take our research to a new level. For example, by integrating sustainable sanitation, water resource management, air pollution abatement, and stewardship of ecosystem services we will be able to support a new green revolution in Africa that responds to the need for climate adaptation.
Download the SEI Strategy for 2010-2014 (PDF: 945kb)
==================================
Why does Donna disenfranchise these important brains and sources?
No comments:
Post a Comment