[I should be clear Nielsen-Gammon is not a denialist, he is a respected scientist familiar with climatology - but what grabbed my attention was how his arguments were framed… and that led to this]
I read the things you write and seems to me you consistently micro-focus on obscure details. You play with data and numbers and trumpet man's inability to perfectly replicate Earth's processes in a lab, or climate model. Using those contrived arguments you tell folks, we have no worries.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
For What It's Worth:
Colorado Floods - statistical certainty vs geophysical realities
Friday, October 25, 2013