"Well known" "journalist" Rose may be, although notorious yellow journalism expert is closer to the mark. What I can't comprehend is why doesn't it matter to RD and his "sceptical" crowd, (or SoD for that matter), that David Rose has been shown to be guilty of malicious misrepresentation of established facts and broadcaster of slanderous lies on numerous occasions.
And so the Republican/libertarian echo-chamber goes. Without that fabricated foundation of lies they have nothing to defend. Then they wonder why some call them Denialists!
Does SoD care?