Denialists Dodging Debate, (the landscapesandcyles saga)

It'll probably be another few weeks before I can file the final installment(s) of my Landscapesandcycles project, namely, a "document of complaint," regarding Mr. Jim Steele's mis-representation of modern climate science understanding and worse his many slanders of honorable professional scientists.

I thought I'd try one last shout out to Mr. Steele, for that Climate Science Debate he keeps demanding of others.

Considering that my emails remain ignored, I've decided to share the 'update email' I sent to Mr. Steele and various Administrators of San Francisco State University a couple days ago. 

I appreciate many serious scientists don't like my seemingly belligerent approach, sorry, seems to me sometimes it takes a little table thumping for people to take notice of rapidly approaching situations they want to ignore.  I'm no scientist, I'm no scholar, I'm a witness trying to draw attention to a serious situation that's being ignored.  Namely, the acceptance and entertaining of the Big Lie, slander, misrepresentation of established facts, etc..

In any event, this blogpost will serve as my summation of my Landscapesandcycles-CC/Steele Debate Project, along with another invitation to Mr. Jim Steele to step up to a honorable debate of the specifics.  It is also an invitation for the Administrators of the San Francisco State University to start considering the nonsense that is being presented as science under their flag.

{Mr. Steele, you are invited to respond, I assure you I welcome and will post any complaints, corrects or thoughts you care to share over here at WUWTW.}

____________________________________

sent Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:52 AM - open email

Jim Steele, honorable individuals of the San Francisco State University, others,

Since Jim and SFSU folks ignored my earlier emails I haven't bothered sharing new installments as they've developed.  But, we're at a point I owe you an update.

It does concern the reputation of San Francisco State University insofar as the public perception of your commitment to 'fidelity to the ethic of truthfully teaching current scientific understanding'... and, matters such as not lying about the facts; not engaging in character assassination to argue science, and such.

I'm no scholar so I don't have experience organizing this sort of document thus I'm doing a bit of flailing but trust I'll figure it out. -  What you should know is that after much time and effort I have gathered extensive evidence and I hope to be able to put together a coherent persuasive 'complaint' before too long.

Major issues I want to focus on?  

Slander of honorable professional scientists - is unacceptable ... 

Dismissal of the scientific understanding of greenhouse gas geophysics - is unacceptable given contemporary understanding ... 

Misrepresenting scientific studies - is unacceptable … 

The notion that "landscapes and natural cycles" dominate the global climate system within which they exist - is science fantasy, more deception than science ...

With that, and the following list of pertinent background blog posts, I wish you all good days till we meet again.

Sincerely, PM/CC

_________________________________________

Jim has ignored my detailed critiques of his claims, he's ignored my evidence.  But he has posted about me within the protective confines of his echo-chamber.  

Here's a comparison of two different styles and attitudes toward learning - Mr. Steele's complete unaltered words along with my responses.

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Clarifying Landscapesandcycles Dishonest Internet Sniping #1

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/06/landscapesandcycles-internet-sniping1.html

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Clarifying Landscapesandcycles Smears and Internet Snipers #2

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/06/landscapesandcycles-clarifying-smears2.html

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

This is when I put my Steele/SFSU project aside and I went into a few weeks of letting it simmer, taking in new information and thinking about how best to explain myself, it's a work in progress for sure, but I'm getting closer.

Monday, May 11, 2015

Question: Best liar wins? re CC/Steele Debate

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/05/bestliar-wins-ccsteeledebate.html

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

If Mr. Steele were sincerely into a Scientific Debate (the constructive type) here's a good place to start, it would establish a baseline upon which we could build.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Mr. Jim Steele, Can you clarify your argument?

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/01/landscapesandcycles-clarify-your.html

A) That wildlife biologists working in extreme conditions and over continental landscapes make mistakes ?

B) Disputing that Anthropogenic Global Warming with it's profound changing climate driven landscapes alterations causes adverse cascading consequences for wildlife and eco-systems (read our biosphere) ?  

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

I admit I've played hardball and have written some harsh words, but please consider the difference of insults/sins of exasperation compared to the tactical use of insults/sins to negate your opponent's information.  

Jim seems all venom and anger.  Then the extrapolations begin, as he frantically paints me with all the hideous suspicion he can muster.  Watts up with that?  Where's the humor, where's an acknowledgement of our fellow humanity, where's a little self-skepticism and dare I say touch of self-deprecation?

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Jim Steele watt's up with your venomous self-indignation?

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/02/why-your-venomous-indignation.html

Sunday, January 25, 2015

Dear Mr. Steele, regarding your 1/7/15 WUWT post - an open letter...

http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2015/01/jimsteele-wuwt-anopenletter.html