What’s baloney is trying to have a political debate with a serious scientist. The lawyerly/political debate is focused on winning an argument at all costs, honesty and ethics be damned.
Revealingly Jim Steele write to editor Fredrick: "Since learning I have the What's Natural column he keeps emailing me all sorts of dishonest BS so I am no going to block all his emails. So I will no longer be privy to his attacks that he emails you. He is simply an obsessed internet sniper. Sniping at me somehow gives purpose to his wretched life."
how "sensitive" the earth is to a doubling of CO2 concentrations. IPCC estimates of how global temperature will respond to a doubling of CO2 range greatly from 1 to 5 degrees centigrade. To accurately determine the earth's sensitivity to higher levels of CO2, we must accurately assess natural climate change.)
We The People of the United States have a moral, ethical right - along with a pragmatic need - to learn what scientists have learned about this planet's biosphere and climate engine without constant dishonest crossfire.
We should not tolerate serious scientists constantly being drown out by amoral, ruthless and frankly ignorant arguments - that an astoundingly ruthless GOP PR factory repeats over and over again, without ever learning a damned thing from the evidence in front of us.
- f) Considering the Missing Key to Stephen Gould’s “Nonoverlapping Magisteria”
e) Map v Territory Problem, Statistical Certainty vs Geophysical Realities
d) Considering our dysfunctional public dialogue in 14 verses.
c) Intellectually Confronting Faith-Based thinking and Dogma Driven Deceptions
b) Saying No To Reality. Questioning the Geologic Column.
a) Who says understanding Earth’s Evolution is irrelevant? 2018