dedicated to confronting the deliberate calculated lies
of the climate science contrarian community!
PO Box 56
Durango, Colorado 81326
citizenschallenge - at - gmail com
But there has certainly been huge advances he chooses to ignore.
Even Science is confined to the limits of our Mental Mindscapes - but at least Scientists believe in the premise that “it takes each other to keep ourselves honest.”
True, true, nature responds to human actions - that’s why we should be a bit more thoughtful about those actions.
You didn’t have one serious word about causation!
We live in modern times and have the instruments that have helped inform and educate us to understand what is going on within our Global Heat and Moisture Distribution Engine, but Mike Hulme finds it more convenient, for his motives, to hide that information from his gullible audience. Shame on him!
From reading this I have to wonder if Hulme actually believes in a personal god and supernatural intervention as part of everyday physical reality? If not, why the hell does he play this rhetorical game?
a “Part” of the Scientific Method:
“… a scientific consensus is, by definition, an evidence-based consensus.A convergence of the weight of existing evidence is a prerequisite which distinguishes a knowledge-based scientific consensus from mere agreement.
This is critical, because the scientific enterprise is essentially a meritocracy. As a result, it doesn’t matter if a few contrarians on the fringe disagree with the conclusions unless they can marshal up evidential justification of comparable weight or explain the existing data better.
The weight of the evidence is paramount.In a nutshell, a consensus in science refers to a convergence of many independent lines of high quality evidence all leading the majority of active scientists in a given field to arrive at the same conclusion and/or complimentary conclusions. …”