I received a dismissive, yet challenging, comment from a "mineguy," he claims he can "take down" my arguments with ease.
Okay Mineguy, I'm game. Bet you can't!
I invite you to choose from any of my Jim Steele Critiques (I include the list after my response to your revealing comment.). Then in a rational constructive manner, point out my errors and produce some evidence to support your opinion - I'd be happy to learn from you, if you can produce some rational defensible evidence.
Here let me give you an example of how it's done:
At 3:44PM, August 28, 2016, mineguy's comments:
You could just as easily complain that, me trusting that men landed and walked on the moon is the result of group think.
What's wrong with group think based on facts?
A brief read indicates this WUWTW site is another of the group-think anthropogenic true believers who are incredibly organized to dispute, disparage, and ‘take down’ any sane and objective contrary argument against that line of propaganda.
Find it at "LandscapesAndCycles"
“Group think” - What’s that even mean in this context?
You could just as easily complain that, me trusting that men landed and walked on the moon is the result of group think.
What's wrong with group think based on facts?
