The past two days I've been catching up on the latest internet climate science faux-scandal, the John Bates affair. Fortunately enough has been written about it, see the preceding post for those details, that I won't rehash it here. What I do want to rehash is how easily communicators and reporters fall into the contrarians script without even recognizing it. My case in point is an otherwise good article written by Energy and Environment News reporter Scott Waldman. Reading the offending sentence I felt so irritated I sat down to write him an email that blossomed beyond first intentions and that I want to share since this blog is all about trying to provoke some thought, perhaps even a little soul searching.
______________________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Waldman,
I read your article “'Whistleblower' says protocol was breached but no data fraud”
( http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060049630 ) with much interest, but when I got to the section “Bates: Be careful of bias.” You wrote, "For many years, climate scientists were puzzled by an apparent plateau in global temperatures. …”
What the heck? Global SURFACE temperatures are NOT "global temperatures”!! Why are you repeating that contrarian meme? It was global surface temperatures that seems to "pause" although that was never true either since record temps kept happening. The best that can honestly be said is that the rate of increase had apparently slowed. If I’m being inaccurate please call me on it.
Besides, that 'apparent pause [sic] in Global SURFACE Temperatures, excluded the rapidly warming poles and some other less significant areas of our planet’s surface. Here again, if I'm mistaken on that point, someone please correct me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.meteo.psu.edu/holocene/public_html/Mann/articles/articles/FyfeEtAlNatureClimate16.pdf¶8 It has been suggested20 that the lack of Arctic surface measurements has resulted in an underestimate of the true rate of GMST increase in the early twenty-first century. Independent satellite-based observations21,22 of the temperature of the lower troposphere (TLT; Fig. 2f) have near-global, time- invariant coverage. Although satellite TLT datasets also have important uncertainties21, they corroborate the slowdown of GMST increase23 and provide independent evidence that the slowdown is a real phenomenon. Fyfe et al. 2016
Also see: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/abstract