I've been too busy to do much with my project to dissect JohnSmith's crazy-making, but our exchange at YouTube continues and I believe this particular response is worth sharing with like-minded 'Children of the Intellectual Enlightenment' and rational fact-based thinkers and humanists.
{ More than ever we need to step up and engage with the childish tenets of faith-blinded delusionals, not to mention we need some serious networking between each other. Alone we are impotent, together we have potential.}
You see I've hurt JohnSmith's feelings again, guess I'm too busy pointing out the fallacies he's perpetrating, rather than dancing with him. Since I seem to have a reputation as a rough kinda guy, although I prefer "up front'n honest", it's worth discussing in more detail.
For instance in my defense, instead of responding to my thoughts and queries, the guy reaches for the Whack-A-Mole gambit, which I'm not happy about, though I (and others) am willing to use the opportunities for sharing valid information on any angle of AGW that contrarians care to toss at us.
After sleeping on it, I've decided to share my improved and expanded response. For the original and more of our exchange, check out:
Examining some of the claims in the YouTube video "Recovering Whales, Ocean Acidification, and Climate Horror Stories," I wrote
Dr. Evans, who's data Steele uses and he responded to my questions with an enlightening email, along with suggestions for further investigation. Now that I've spent more time looking into the question of 'what' and 'how' scientists know about ocean acidification, I've decided to give Steele's talk from 2:45 to 5:59 another dissection.
For students of The Art of the Republican Attack on Science, this will be worth your while.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Part 3 Jim Steele's Presentation to the Life Members of the International Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Jim is the author of "Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist's Journey to Climate Skepticism"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2:45 - "Here's your question about ocean acidification. This upwelling is a tremendous benefit. If you do a vertical profile of the ocean, if you look at the surface the pH is gonna be around 8.2-8.3, as you drop down what you see is that it very quickly it becomes more acidic, because bacteria digest everything, we start to releasing the carbon. So you can see in the upwelling zones you can see it's down to 7.7 And when it upwells it brings it right to the coast"
~ ~ ~
First off, notice Jim drawing his audience's attention away from how the oceans absorb CO2, instead focusing on regional upwelling of abyssal acidic waters along the continental shelf.
That's the way magicians work, draw the eye away from where the trick is happening.
Listen in on Steele's talk. You'll hear a hint of the problem he chooses to ignore. The surface of the ocean is on average basic ~8.2-8.3pH as Steele tells us {7 being neutral}. CO2 is acidic and easily binds with water molecules. We live in a world where the atmospheric CO2 concentration has skyrocketed by ~40% in a geologic blink. How will that system behave? How can Steele's IEEE audience be blind to that?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3:20 - "People say on average the pH is getting more, they don't know that. It's a model."
