At one point in my critique I mentioned that Hoffman’s “veridicality” arguments were a smoke screen.
I’m sure, if a student where interested enough to send him an email and request one, that Professor Edelman would be happy to send you a free reprint. At least in my experience scientists have been helpful with responses and surprisingly generous with sharing theirs papers that are behind a paywall. (Let him know Cc sent you.)
volume 22, pages 1519–1522(2015). October 11, 2014
Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash (2014) observe that perception evolves to serve as an interface between the perceiver and the world and proceed to reason that percepts need not, or even cannot, resemble their objects.
I accept their premise, but argue that there are interesting ways in which perception can be truthful, with regard not to “objects” but to relations,
and that evolutionary pressure is expected to favor rather than rule out such veridicality.