I think it's time for some real Earth Observations and science. The contrarians over at Judith's website talk endlessly, making claims, but always leading away from looking at Earth observations. While exuding an attitude that, not knowing everything is the same as knowing nothing. They seem to have no appreciation of our planet's climate as a huge Global Heat Distribution Engine. Instead trusting that a sharp intellect can outsmart Earth processes.
Unfortunately, argue all you want about minute details, or the exactitude of measurements, or philosophizing about science... the bottom line is that we have been doping our atmosphere, and it is impacting our planet in one direction. Our climate is transitioning to a new state - and the less we do to turn down the ongoing doping of our atmosphere the worse the disruptions to the world and life style {we've come to depend on} are going to get.
Since all eyes have been on Hurricane, turned superstorm, Sandy. She's worth a review since she is symptomatic of the changes society's Grand Atmospheric Experiment is bringing to weather processes. Below is a large selection of good articles that lead to authoritative sources that explain the dynamics at work:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How Does Climate Change Make Superstorms Like Sandy More Destructive?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
By Climate Guest Blogger Kevin Trenberth on Oct 29, 2012 at 10:15 am
Why did Hurricane Sandy take such an unusual track into New Jersey?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Frankenstorm: Has Climate Change Created A Monster?
by ADAM FRANK ~ October 28, 2012
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Rose and Curry Double Down on Global Warming Denial
Posted on 23 October 2012 by dana1981
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hurricane Sandy had nothing to do with global warming
http://www.skepticalscience.com/hurricane-sandy-global-warming.htm
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Climate Crock of the Week with Peter Sinclair
New Video:
Hurricane Sandy’s Double Whammy
November 5, 2012
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Posted on 31 October 2012 by John Hartz
This is a round-up of selected news articles and blog posts about Hurricane Sandy, its impacts on North America, and its relationship to climate change. This bulletin supplements the regular SkS weekly News Round-Up which is posted on Saturday of each week.
Sunday, Oct 28
Monday, Oct 29
- Hurricane Sandy mixes super-storm conditions with climate change by Kevin Trenberth, The Conversation, Oct 29, 2012
- In Hurricane Sandy's Fury, The Fingerprint Of Climate Change by Tom Zeller Jr., The Huffington Post, Oct 29, 2012
- Sandy versus Katrina, and Irene: Monster Hurricanes by the Numbers by Mark Fischetti, Scientific American, Oct 29, 2012
- Hurricane Sandy Puts More Than $87 Billion Worth Of Homes At Risk by Morgan Brennan, Forbes, Oct 29, 2012
- Aliens, Sandy And The Coming Global Superstorms by Kenneth Rapoza, Forbes, Oct 29, 2012
- Weather or Climate: What Caused Hurricane Sandy? by Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience, Oct 29, 2012
- 'Storm Like No Other': Ongoing Coverage as Powerful Hurricane Sandy Makes Landfall by Common Dreams staff, Common Dreams, Oct 29, 2012
- We Are All from New Orleans Now: Climate Change, Hurricanes and the Fate of America's Coastal Cities by Mike Tidwell, The Nation, Oct 29, 2012
- On ‘Frankenstorms,’ Climate Science and ‘Reverse Tribalism’ by Andrew Revkin, Dot Earth, New York Times, Oct 29, 2012
- Yes, Hurricane Sandy is a good reason to worry about climate change by Brad Plumer, Ezra Klein's WonkBlog, Washington Post, Oct 29, 2012
- Hurricane Sandy's Economic Impact Likely To Be Immense by Marilyn Geewax, NPR, Oct 29, 2012
- On Not Scaring Ourselves to Death: Moving Beyond the Adrenaline Rush of a Good Storm to an Energy Revolution by Daphne Wysham, Institute for Policy Studies, Oct 29, 2012
- Slow-moving hurricanes such as Sandy on the rise by Michael Marshall, New Scientist, Oct 29, 2012
- Did Climate Change Supersize Hurricane Sandy? By Chris Mooney, Mother Jones, Oct 29, 2012
Tuesday, Oct 30
- Sandy Deals New York City Flooding, Fire And Blackouts by Scott Neumann, NPR, Oct 30, 2012
- Sandy leaves NYC subway system, infrastructure licking its wounds by James Eng, NBC News, Oct 30, 2012
- Obama declares major disaster in NYC, NJ as Sandy kills 28, causes major flooding and fires by Miguel Llanos, NBC News, Oct 30, 2012
- Television News Outlets Ignore Climate Change During Sandy Coverage. Should We Really Be Surprised? by Stephen Lacey, Climate Progress, Oct 30, 2012
- Global Warming Systemically Caused Hurricane Sandy by George Lakoff, The Huffington Post, Oct 30, 2012
- Climate Change Takes The Campaign By Storm: Countdown Day 7 by Howard Fineman, The Huffington Post, Oct 30, 2012
- Hurricane Sandy spins up climate discussion by Jeff Tollefson, Nature, Oct 30, 2012
- Hurricane Sandy Pushing Obama, Romney to Break Climate Silence by Common Dreams staff, Common Dreams, Oct 30, 2012
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Posted on 4 November 2012 by John Hartz
This is the second installment of a a round-up of selected news articles and blog posts about Hurricane Sandy, its impacts on the Caribbean and North America, and its relationship to climate change. This bulletin supplements the regular SkS weekly News Round-Up which is posted on Saturday of each week. A key pragraph has been extracted verbatim from each article in order to provide insight into the article's content.
Arriving atop fantastically warm water and aided by a full foot of sea-level rise during the last century, Hurricane Sandy is just the latest example of climate change’s impact on human society. Unless we rapidly phase out our use of fossil fuels, most Americans within shouting distance of an ocean will—in coming years—live behind the sort of massive levees and floodgates that mark Louisiana today.
As the Caribbean reaches the end of October – the second-to-last month of the Atlantic hurricane season – Sandy has caused significant material losses and claimed the lives of 44 people in Haiti, 11 in Cuba, two in the Dominican Republic, one in Jamaica and one in the Bahamas.
Hurricane Sandy seems straight out of a Hollywood apocalyptic blockbuster. But a confluence of environmental and topographical characteristics helps explain its vast size, slow progress, storm surge and multiple methods of wreaking havoc on the coast and deep inland, scientists say.
But no president can cross Big Oil in the way that is required to defuse the climate crisis without the help of a powerful and sustained popular movement. If Hurricane Sandy contributes to building such a movement—and McKibben and his fellow activists at 350.org and allied organizations are launching a national tour shortly after Election Day that aims to do just that—America might still avoid the curse of Cassandra by heeding her warnings at last.
Watching the images of Sandy leaving a path of destruction brings back memories of the day after Hurricane Andrew hit my home in Miami back in 1992. The state of shock as my parents and I approached our storm ravaged home is still fresh in my memory even 20 years later as I see the faces of those who are experiencing the same today.
By the time Hurricane Sandy hit the Northeast coast on Monday, upending lives across the Eastern half of the country, it had become a freakish hybrid of a large, late-season hurricane and a winter storm more typical of the middle latitudes. Though by no means unprecedented, that type of hybrid storm is rare enough that scientists have not studied whether it is likely to become more common in a warming climate.
But scientists agree on one point: Rising sea levels caused primarily by global warming could worsen the effects of storms such as Sandy, particularly when it comes to storm surge. And that means coastal communities throughout the United States must think about what they’ll need for protection from such storms.
The images of a paralysed New York City at the mercy of Hurricane Sandy's wall of water have forced climate change on to the political agenda in the final week of the 2012 presidential election campaign. Even before Sandy made landfall political commentators were debating whether the storm would be better for Mitt Romney or Barack Obama. In any event it has brought forth statements from prominent Democrats and elected officials on climate change and spurred public debate about the neglected topic.
Miller strongly disagreed with my discussion of the science revealing past patterns of extreme storminess in the Northeast and the science pointing to a rising human influence on some (but not all) kinds of extreme weather. The exchange is worth posting here now (Miller gave permission), to give you a sense of how intelligent people with related, if not identical, goals can interpret a large body of science very differently:
"Folks, second year in a row the New York metro area has been [hit] by this stuff," said Todd, NBC News's Chief White House Correspondent and host of The Daily Rundown on MSNBC. "Let's not bury our heads in the sand when it comes to something has changed in the Atlantic. The climate has changed. It's called climate change, folks."
Up to now, New York's response to flood threats has been to build smaller-scale barriers around facilities to make them more resilient to flooding. A multibillion-dollar project to create a storm surge defense system hasn't been on the agenda. "The city has been very polite, and they agree that in the long term it will become a necessity," Bowman said. "But for now they say, not yet. They're focusing on resilience, solutions to small problems."
Democrats have been AWOL on climate change, but Republicans have been even more recalcitrant. Their failure is odd, because in other areas of national security Republicans pride themselves on their vigilance. Romney doesn’t want to wait until he sees an Iranian nuclear weapon before acting, so why the passivity about climate change?
A huge storm barrels down on the United States, wreaking havoc with punishing winds, record flooding, heavy snowfall and massive blackouts. Is the main culprit climate change or a freak set of coincidences?
Climate science explains how global warming can make a superstorms like Sandy more destructive in several ways:
The evidence is not yet in for the East Coast in 2011 and 2012, but the general trends are increasingly clear. In its 2012 report on managing the risks of extreme events and disasters, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that "A changing climate leads to changes in the frequency, intensity, spatial extent, duration, and timing of extreme weather and climate events, and can result in unprecedented extreme weather and climate events."
Earlier this week, New York's Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) issued a pointed statement on climate change and its role in the monstrous storm from which his state -- and many others -- will be recovering for months, and perhaps years, to come.
"It's a longer conversation, but I think part of learning from this is the recognition that climate change is a reality," Cuomo said. "Extreme weather is a reality. It is a reality that we are vulnerable."
I’ve tried this week, as sporadic Internet access allowed, to foster some productive discourse amid a media environment that seems dead-set on creating polarization. The two most vivid examples on my mind at the moment are “It’s Global Warming, Stupid,” a much-shared essay in Bloomberg Businessweek, and an effort by Anthony Watts, inspired by a ridiculous U.S. News Sandy-warming poll, to list scientists and commentators for and against global warming as the storm’s cause.
In a surprise announcement, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said Thursday that Hurricane Sandy had reshaped his thinking about the presidential campaign and that as a result he was endorsing President Obama.
As NCAR’s Gerald Meehl, a co-author of the study, explained to me by e-mail, it’s a lot easier to stabilize global temperatures by cutting carbon emissions than it is to stabilize sea-level rise. The carbon-dioxide that we’ve already loaded into the atmosphere will likely have effects on the oceans for centuries to come. “But with aggressive mitigation,” Meehl added, “you can slow down the rate of sea level rise, which buys time for adaptation measures.”
Bloomberg Businessweek editor Josh Tyrangiel tweeted, "Our cover story this week may generate controversy, but only among the stupid."
Hurricane Sandy has broken the so-called “climate silence” of this year’s elections. The storm has thrown a wrench into campaign efforts, halting activities Monday and Tuesday as it became impossible to ignore the topic of climate change, which has penetrated the national dialogue.
“While one storm ‘might have happened anyway’ in a mythical non-industrial world, the general level of weird weather (an amalgam of many events) is clearly caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gases,” says David Archer, a professor at the University of Chicago, in an email. “Like you could figure out that dice are loaded by tossing them a few times, more than just once.” (His book, The Long Thaw, is one of the best quick reads on climate change.)
On Tuesday, I posted some suggestions for how people could help the victims of Hurricane Sandy here in the United States. I neglected to mention the horrific suffering in impoverished Haiti, which was pummeled by Sandy’s devastating trajectory before she hit US shores.
Those crazy, radical hippies at Bloomberg Businessweek have gone and done it. With the blunt, no-nonsense cover that likely already appeared on your Facebook feed or Twitter stream or Tumblr dashboard, Businessweek dared state with certainty what so many media outlets have nervously danced around in their coverage of Superstorm Sandy: It’s Global Warming, Stupid.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
