John W. Geier MD, commented at
Robert Holmes aka 1000Frolly PhD. Conman is, as Conman does....
The main science issue is that the Earth cannot act as its own experimental control.
Computer models of the Earth’s climate reflect the biases and knowledge gaps of the modellers and amplify errors over time.
It is unfortunate that the other terrestrial planets in this solar system are quite different from Earth.
The climate is a holistic function of the stellar flux, atmosphere and distribution of land and ocean on a planet.
september 28, 2021 at 10:53 PM
{ I’ve been busy with chores, so not much going on at my blogs. Getting an intelligent comment, let alone any serious discussion, is fairly rare, so sometimes there's many days where I don't bother checking my comments folder.
This morning I found a comment from a couple weeks ago (how the time flies) it was refreshingly coherent, at least against the backdrop of what I usually get, and it offers me something worth discussing. The sort of comment I feel obligated to post and respond it.
Dr. John Geier's comment fits that bill. Even if I believe he's being deceptive, and missing the forest for the trees. Thing is, I imagine he might well be deceiving himself first and foremost. Which is why I want to try and explain what he's missing, hopefully doing a little better than the time before.}
With all due respect Dr. Geier, that is nonsense. We know plenty well what is going on within our global heat and moisture distribution engine. Science has been intensely studying our atmosphere since the 1940s - nature is not some trickster and we don't need another Earth to experiment with in order to understand how our Earth's geosphere/biosphere behaves.
Why do you set impossible expectations?
