Open note to Donna Laframboise,
I don't understand how your attacks on the IPCC and it's authors have received so much mileage. Besides dishonestly portraying the IPCC as something looked at like a "Bible" you ignore most of the IPCC process and misrepresent the rest.
Worst is your venomous attacks on young scientists.
Here's how you put it in your "The Delinquent Teenager":
"But rather than being written by a meticulous, upstanding professional in business attire (aka the world’s top scientists & best experts), the Climate Bible is produced by a slapdash, slovenly teenager who has trouble distinguishing right from wrong (aka, activists, 20-something graduate students, people appointed due to their gender or their country).
The world needs to confront the folly that is the IPCC."
Your shrill derision of young scientists totally ignores the fact that young men and women have been the backbone of science through the generations.
For example, the Atomic Bomb could never have been developed without those 20-something graduate students; scientists; mathematicians you show such dripping contempt for.
Here is a review and I ask Donna to consider where the Manhattan Project would have been without these fine young minds?
This information was gathered mainly from
Manhattan Project Heritage Preservation Association
and Wikipedia.com searches:
