It is simply untrue that Prof. Steven Koonin is confronting climate scientists with unpleasant facts they ignored or failed to understand. Atmospheric Scientist, Ben Santer PhD
I haven't done much on the climate science denial front lately, since it's gotten too depressing, especially for those of us who pay attention to the increasing imbalance and the ongoing and unsustainable degradation of our Earth's biosphere.
Besides, seems to me it's not a problem with climate sciences, or the scientists who do it, we have achieved a plenty good at understanding the mechanisms unfolding within our global heat and moisture distribution engine and biosphere. (Just need to be willing to do your homework and honestly learn about it.)
The problem is with the delusional thinking people love to wrap themselves within.
Which is why I've move on a bit and why I undertook: Donald Hoffman Playing Basketball In Zero-gravity, my book review and student resource building project.
Interestingly, lately I've been thinking about Ben Santer and how he's been doing these days - since his case, seemed to me, one of the first where climate science denialists showed their complete willingness to engage in no holds barred, malicious, ruthless misrepresentations, character assassinations, and dirty tricks. Then I read the following and figured why not give it a little more web presence, it's worth reading and thinking about.
This is why I'm sharing this important PSA that I read at SkepticalScience.com. For more on Ben Santer: My Climate Story - Ben Santer, also:
IPCC: the dirty tricks climate scientists faced in three decades since first report
August 27, 2020 - TheConversation.com
The Relentless Attack on Climate Scientist Ben Santer
May 16, 2014 - BillMoyers.com
The consensus-building process of the IPCC
February 12, 2012 - SkepticalScience.com
Close Encounters of the Absurd Kind
February 24, 2010 - RealClimate.org
Dr. Ben Santer: 'Climate Denialism Has No Place at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory'
Posted on 25 May 2021 by Guest Author, Ben Santer
This is a repost of Dr. Santer's statement via the Union of Concerned Scientists blog and we thank UCS for this permission. (As I thank Skeptical Science and Union of Concerned Scientists for making my reposting possible! Cc)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has invited Professor Steven Koonin to give a seminar on May 27, 2021. Professor Koonin’s seminar will cover material contained in a book he published on May 4. His book is entitled “Unsettled”. Its basic thesis is that climate science is not trustworthy.
Professor Koonin is not a climate scientist. I am. I have worked at LLNL since 1992. My primary job is to evaluate computer models of the climate system. I also seek to improve understanding of human and natural influences on climate.
In collaboration with scientific colleagues around the world, our research group at LLNL has identified human “fingerprints” in temperature changes at Earth’s surface, in the atmosphere, and in the oceans. We have also found human fingerprints in rainfall and moisture. LLNL’s fingerprint research is one small part of a large body of evidence that contributed to scientific findings of a “discernible human influence on global climate”.
I have interacted with Professor Koonin since late 2013. Back then, he argued that uncertainties in climate science were large and were not fully acknowledged by climatescientists. In his view, climate science was not sufficiently “mature” to be useful to policymakers. Similar claims are advanced in his new book.
It is simply untrue that Prof. Koonin is confronting climate scientists with unpleasant facts they ignored or failed to understand.
