In my decades long experience dialoging with climate science “skeptics" they consistently respond to reasoned critique of their arguments by sidetracking the discussion with personal attacks intent on making their 'opponents' seem as detestable as possible thus making any facts irrelevant, as Zoe so ably demonstrated in the last post.
Respect, fairplay, honesty, honor, constructive learning means nothing. Decapitate one’s ‘opponents’ before they can drive home any arguments or evidence regarding Manmade Global Warming.
Poptech at “populartechnology-net” provided a text book example last year and since he seems to be slinking around the internet peddling his fable again, I figure I’ll get personal myself and share the response which separates Poptech’s fabrications from the facts.
Besides, it fits right in with the pathetic John Bates’ Affair - John’s MO is the same, malicious manipulation and omission of facts, spin the narrative away from the matter at hand and aim for character assassination.
__________________________________________________ORIGINALLY POSTED FEBRUARY 2nd 2016 under the title: "Lord of the Flies* (#8 Poptech's Truth).
AL writes Sunday, January 31, 2016 - 1:19 citizenschallengeYT Hahahahaha…:P http://www.populartechnology.net/2016/01/the-truth-about-whatsupwiththatwatts-et.html?m=1Oh boy, talk about desperation to dig up shit, well they dug and they dug and oh the facts and links they've unearthed. But, even more impressive than what they unearthed - is the vindictive theatrical spin they put on everything.
