I received a dismissive, yet challenging, comment from a "mineguy," he claims he can "take down" my arguments with ease.
Okay Mineguy, I'm game. Bet you can't!
I invite you to choose from any of my Jim Steele Critiques (I include the list after my response to your revealing comment.). Then in a rational constructive manner, point out my errors and produce some evidence to support your opinion - I'd be happy to learn from you, if you can produce some rational defensible evidence.
Here let me give you an example of how it's done:
You could just as easily complain that, me trusting that men landed and walked on the moon is the result of group think.
What's wrong with group think based on facts?
You bet I’m a true believer in the human capacity to radically and fundamentally change this Earth.
If you want organized you need to look to the Conservative Think Tanks, they got science by rhetoric and slander down to an extremely well honed PR machine. As for broadcasting their fraud against science and the people's right to know, jezz that is some amazing organization at work, and you know it. *
Hmmm, mineguy never did return to backup his boast. It Appears mineguy is nothing more than another drive-by, oh so big on talk, not so good on substance. Go figure.
Jim Steele and his
The Heartland Institute collection:
Where Jim gets weird is the way he slams these same individuals by portraying them as clueless shills. Where Jim gets bizarre is leaping from those shortcomings in wildlife studies to claiming it proves global warming is a hoax and that we should ignore it. An astounding chain of logic.